UPS Dynasty Cap Message Board

Log in Biatch!
UPS Dynasty Cap Message Board

Message Board for UPS Dynasty Cap

Latest topics

» UW mid-year multi
Yesterday at 12:41 pm by UlteriorWarrior

» Chivalry mid year multi
Wed Sep 20, 2017 12:50 pm by C-Town Chivalry

» Blake Bombers Contract Extensions
Wed Sep 20, 2017 10:51 am by Blake Bombers

» Blake Bombers in season multi
Wed Sep 20, 2017 10:45 am by Blake Bombers

» C'mon Son Extension
Tue Sep 05, 2017 3:07 pm by Raining Bullets

» White Power Extensions
Tue Sep 05, 2017 3:03 pm by Raining Bullets

» UW Extension
Tue Sep 05, 2017 3:02 pm by Raining Bullets

» Blake Bombers FA Auction Contracts 2017
Tue Sep 05, 2017 3:01 pm by Raining Bullets

» Thomas Rawls
Tue Sep 05, 2017 3:00 pm by Raining Bullets


    Added offensive Position

    Share
    avatar
    Blake Bombers

    Posts : 77
    Join date : 2012-06-16

    Added offensive Position

    Post by Blake Bombers on Thu Feb 27, 2014 10:13 pm

    I would like to propose an additional RB as a mandatory starter. Only 1 RB as a mandatory starter is weak.
    avatar
    Raining Bullets
    Admin

    Posts : 554
    Join date : 2012-05-06
    Age : 35
    Location : Pembroke Pines Fl

    Re: Added offensive Position

    Post by Raining Bullets on Fri Feb 28, 2014 6:48 am

    I like the idea personally. I would prefer to not eliminate one of the flex spots. So what we are considering is 1QB 2RB 2 WR 1 TE & 2 Flex.
    avatar
    Blake Bombers

    Posts : 77
    Join date : 2012-06-16

    Re: Added offensive Position

    Post by Blake Bombers on Fri Feb 28, 2014 7:58 am

    Yes I should have clarified more but I would be proposing what Keith outlined above
    avatar
    Raining Bullets
    Admin

    Posts : 554
    Join date : 2012-05-06
    Age : 35
    Location : Pembroke Pines Fl

    Re: Added offensive Position

    Post by Raining Bullets on Sat Mar 01, 2014 1:21 pm

    One issue that might be brought to the table is that lineups are constructed and values are determined using the 1 RB mandatory and this might not fit some owner's model.

    A potential compromise might be to have it stay the same this year and put the change through for 2015 thus giving owners a full year to adapt and plan for a revised lineup. I am sure some owners have completely devalued the 2nd RB position (rightfully so) and might be resistance to immediate change.  But if there was a "transition period" they might be more receptive.  Because the I do like the idea of making it more difficult to manage your starting lineups. It would certainly make the league better.

    Just a thought to ponder for any owner who might be completely opposed to the idea.  Maybe a year of transition might be something that would work.
    avatar
    Good in Da Hood

    Posts : 100
    Join date : 2012-05-17

    Re: Added offensive Position

    Post by Good in Da Hood on Sat Apr 12, 2014 8:36 am

    Solid proposal. I would be game if we dropped a flex spot and did not proceed with rule until 2015. I'm all set with one flex over two and not having to decide between a 4th wr, 2nd te, or 3rd rb.
    avatar
    Raining Bullets
    Admin

    Posts : 554
    Join date : 2012-05-06
    Age : 35
    Location : Pembroke Pines Fl

    Re: Added offensive Position

    Post by Raining Bullets on Mon Apr 14, 2014 12:52 pm

    I think the idea of Blake's is to make things more challenging. In an era of football where scoring is at an all-time high it makes sense to increase the number of starters. This rewards the savy owners and also puts a premium on finding diamond in the rough and not just loading up on the studs.
    avatar
    SexManther

    Posts : 94
    Join date : 2012-05-17

    Re: Added offensive Position

    Post by SexManther on Sun Apr 27, 2014 2:13 pm

    I am always game for making things more difficult or strategic .

    Sign me Up
    avatar
    C-Town Chivalry

    Posts : 79
    Join date : 2012-06-12

    Re: Added offensive Position

    Post by C-Town Chivalry on Wed Apr 30, 2014 10:17 pm

    totally fine with this for 2015 season

    Sponsored content

    Re: Added offensive Position

    Post by Sponsored content


      Current date/time is Mon Sep 25, 2017 4:04 am